Decision Support System

The FRAMES Decision Support System, or DSS, can be used as a road map with the following 10 questions to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.

1 What is the flood risk (sea, river, rainfall) and which are the flood risk challenges in your region?

Typical challenges for areas:

  • Coastal flooding as main challenge (Zeeland, Denmark)
  • Fluvial flooding and coastal flooding/influence  (Alblasserwaard, Wesermarsch)
  • Fluvial flooding (UK pilots, Belgium pilots)
  • Pluvial flooding: surface water flooding

When this is not clear, please make use of the following tools

  • Flood risk maps delivered for the EU Flood Directive
  • Pilots: Scenario’s and other forecasting techniques to define future challenges
  • Pilots: IPCC reports and national adaptation strategies

Discuss flood risk scenarios and define challenges for resilient areas and communities with relevant stakeholders 2 What is the emphasis of the current FRMS applied in your area?

  • Apply multilevel and multi-actor to discuss regional flood risk management strategies
  • Multilevel: EU, national, regional, local
  • Multi-actor: government, private companies, NGOs, citizens.

3 How is flood risk management organized in my country?

4 What is the desired situation in relation to the flood risk challenges for the region?

5 What are potential MLS-actions to enhance the flood resilience of your region?

Overview of actions based on analysis pilot activities

  • Linked to MLS layers
  • Linked to area context to apply actions: coastal, fluvial, pluvial
  • Linked to Diversification of Governance context to apply actions (or adaptation of FGRA required): low, medium, high
  • Pilots can be used as examples

6 What is the impact of potential (spatial) actions on systems and sectors in the region?

Make sure to harmonize impact assessments with the national adaptation strategies

7 Who should be involved and what level should participation be?

  • Stakeholder analysis examples by project
  • Link to FRGA to support stakeholder analysis
  • Analysis of multilevel and multi-actor setting, including participation level, during pilot implementation
  • Analyse differences between pilot implementation and FRGA

8 How can the implementation process for MLS-pilots be organized?

There are three types of pilot implementation processes:

  • Goal oriented (Reimerswaal, …)
  • Participatory process oriented (UK)
  • Planning process oriented (DAPP Denmark)

Differences are mainly based on the governance context, the organization in the lead in the pilot and the role in the FRGA.

9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results?

10 Which capacities are key to foster adaptation towards a more diversified flood risk management strategy?

  • Analysis of adaptive capacities lacking, employed or emerging in pilots studies, based on pilot processes
  • Provides on a more abstract level to decision-makers which capacities are needed for planning, implementation and up-scaling of MLS
  • Roadmap for capacity building for pilots to become successful working on diversified FRM

Make sure to interview decision-makers about adaptive capacities