PR 00206: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
(Adapted the assignment to 2020 situation) |
||
Regel 3: | Regel 3: | ||
#Setting criteria for robustness so that we can test future changes against these criteria. What is really robust and why? | #Setting criteria for robustness so that we can test future changes against these criteria. What is really robust and why? | ||
#Definition of an ideal Robust Water System for the region using the criteria defined under 1 and the input of strategic developments (Visie Waterbeheer 2050, SAZ+, Vitale Kanaalzone, Nieuwe Sluis) | #Definition of an ideal Robust Water System for the region using the criteria defined under 1 and the input of strategic developments (Visie Waterbeheer 2050, SAZ+, Vitale Kanaalzone, Nieuwe Sluis) | ||
#To sketch an outline of the future of our Robust Water System (timeframe 2030 | #To sketch an outline of the future of our Robust Water System (timeframe now to 2030 and 2050) starting from the current situation in order to determine how resilient it really is (foreward projection). This requires: an update of the project map of the region to the extent as if all described project possibilities have already been executed. This requires further detailing of the projects and expected outcome. | ||
#Translating the ideal resilient future to measures needed today (projection). | #Translating the ideal resilient future to measures needed today (backward projection). | ||
#*Analyse what this means to currently desired interventions in the region. | #*Analyse what this means to currently desired interventions in the region. | ||
#*Determine which gaps still exist in relation to our ambitions and jointly define what is still required (and by when) to complete the desired picture. | #*Determine which gaps still exist in relation to our ambitions and jointly define what is still required (and by when) to complete the desired picture. | ||
A group of | A group of six students will work on this assignment: | ||
* | * 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 3 | ||
* | * 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 4 | ||
{{Project config}} | {{Project config}} | ||
{{Project | {{Project |
Huidige versie van 24 sep 2020 om 12:23
Aim
The system of study in this assignment comprises the region “Kanaalzone Zeeuws-Vlaanderen” (between the Western Scheldt Estuary, shores of the channel Ghent – Terneuzen, Braakman creek recreational area, and to the South crossing the Dutch/Belgian border (including Isabella and Leopold canals). The aims of the study are threefold:
- Setting criteria for robustness so that we can test future changes against these criteria. What is really robust and why?
- Definition of an ideal Robust Water System for the region using the criteria defined under 1 and the input of strategic developments (Visie Waterbeheer 2050, SAZ+, Vitale Kanaalzone, Nieuwe Sluis)
- To sketch an outline of the future of our Robust Water System (timeframe now to 2030 and 2050) starting from the current situation in order to determine how resilient it really is (foreward projection). This requires: an update of the project map of the region to the extent as if all described project possibilities have already been executed. This requires further detailing of the projects and expected outcome.
- Translating the ideal resilient future to measures needed today (backward projection).
- Analyse what this means to currently desired interventions in the region.
- Determine which gaps still exist in relation to our ambitions and jointly define what is still required (and by when) to complete the desired picture.
A group of six students will work on this assignment:
- 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 3
- 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 4