|
|
| Regel 1: |
Regel 1: |
| ''Table 1: Comparison of flood risk governance arrangements (FRGAs), adapted from Matzcak et al., 2016:72, completed for Germany and Denmark by using Buijs et al., 2018.''
| |
| {| class="wikitable"
| |
| !Characteristics of governance
| |
| !Belgium
| |
| !Germany
| |
| !Denmark
| |
| !the Netherlands
| |
| !United Kingdom
| |
| |-
| |
| !Diversification & dominance
| |
| |Moderately diversified, defence still important
| |
| |High diversified, focus on defence
| |
| |Highly diversified, focus on defence
| |
| |Low diversification, defence dominant
| |
| |Highly diversified, quite balanced
| |
| |-
| |
| !Multi-sector
| |
| |Water sector and spatial planning gaining equal importance; water sector still important
| |
| |Multi-sector involvement & integrated by spatial planning
| |
| |Multi-sector involvement (landowners and farmers have a say; landowners do not pay)
| |
| |Water sector dominant
| |
| |Multi-sector involvement & integrated by spatial planning
| |
| |-
| |
| !Multi-actor
| |
| |Public (state dominant)
| |
| |Public (state and federal states) dominant
| |
| |Public & private
| |
| |Public (state dominant)
| |
| |Public & private
| |
| |-
| |
| !Multi-level
| |
| |Decentralised, tendency towards centralisation
| |
| |Central guidance & decentralization to federal state & local level
| |
| |Central guidance & ongoing decentralization to local level
| |
| |Both central and regional level
| |
| |Central and local level
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| {{Light Context | | {{Light Context |
| |Sequence number=175000 | | |Sequence number=175000 |
