PR 00144: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
| Regel 28: | Regel 28: | ||
'''ABSTRACT''' | '''ABSTRACT''' | ||
Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. | |||
.... a | .... a closer focus on the process | ||
.... a | ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community | ||
.... The results of this research are relevant for....... | .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... | ||
.... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography | |||
.... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation | |||
=== Paper 2 - The process of social innovation === | === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation === | ||
| Regel 43: | Regel 47: | ||
'''ABSTRACT''' | '''ABSTRACT''' | ||
.... The results of this research are relevant for. | While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. | ||
.... Concepts? The encounter &...? | |||
.... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. | |||
=== Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? === | === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? === | ||
Versie van 23 okt 2017 07:56
Keywords to describe our research:
- Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation
Abstracts
Identify the purpose (motivation)
- Why did you decide to do this study or project?
- How did you conduct your research?
- Why is this research and your findings important?
- Why should someone read your entire essay?
- This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.
Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)
- What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?
- What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?
- What is your main claim or argument?
Describe the method (approach)
Give your conclusion
- What are the implications of your work?
- Are your results general or very specific?
Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words.
Paper 1 - Theoretical paper
- huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformatief / ....opzoeken).
- GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.
- Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.
- Combinatie met Human and Social Geography
ABSTRACT
Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process.
.... a closer focus on the process
....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community
.... looks at micro connections between individuals....
.... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography
.... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation
Paper 2 - The process of social innovation
- lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?
- relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?
- inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!
- etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.
ABSTRACT
While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process.
.... Concepts? The encounter &...?
.... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline.
Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself?
- link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:
- zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?
ABSTRACT
.... The results of this research are relevant for.......
Paper 4 - Politics of care
- Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.
- antropologie van beleidsmakers.
ABSTRACT
.... The results of this research are relevant for.......
Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise
- Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd
- de rol van plaats
- vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie
- sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep
ABSTRACT
.... The results of this research are relevant for.......
Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography
- Professional als object van solidariteit.
- buffer zijn / risico absorberen
- pedagogie als discipline?
ABSTRACT
.... The results of this research are relevant for.......