PR 00274: verschil tussen versies

Versie van 18 sep 2019 11:06

The FRAMES Decision Support System, or DSS, can be used as a road map with the following 10 questions to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.

1 What is the flood risk (sea, river, rainfall) and which are the flood risk challenges in your region?

Typical challenges for areas:

Coastal flooding as main challenge (Zeeland, Denmark)
Fluvial flooding and coastal flooding/influence (Alblasserwaard, Wesermarsch)
Fluvial flooding (UK pilots, Belgium pilots)
Pluvial flooding: surface water flooding

When this is not clear, please make use of the following tools

Flood risk maps delivered for the EU Flood Directive
Pilots: Scenario’s and other forecasting techniques to define future challenges
Pilots: IPCC reports and national adaptation strategies

Discuss flood risk scenarios and define challenges for resilient areas and communities with relevant stakeholders 2 What is the emphasis of the current FRMS applied in your area?

Apply multilevel and multi-actor to discuss regional flood risk management strategies
Multilevel: EU, national, regional, local
Multi-actor: government, private companies, NGOs, citizens.

3 How is flood risk management organized in my country?

4 What is the desired situation in relation to the flood risk challenges for the region?

5 What are potential MLS-actions to enhance the flood resilience of your region?

Overview of actions based on analysis pilot activities

Linked to MLS layers
Linked to area context to apply actions: coastal, fluvial, pluvial
Linked to Diversification of Governance context to apply actions (or adaptation of FGRA required): low, medium, high
Pilots can be used as examples

6 What is the impact of potential (spatial) actions on systems and sectors in the region?

Make sure to harmonize impact assessments with the national adaptation strategies

7 Who should be involved and what level should participation be?

Stakeholder analysis examples by project
Link to FRGA to support stakeholder analysis
Analysis of multilevel and multi-actor setting, including participation level, during pilot implementation
Analyse differences between pilot implementation and FRGA

8 How can the implementation process for MLS-pilots be organized?

There are three types of pilot implementation processes:

Goal oriented (Reimerswaal, …)
Participatory process oriented (UK)
Planning process oriented (DAPP Denmark)

Differences are mainly based on the governance context, the organization in the lead in the pilot and the role in the FRGA.

9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results?

10 Which capacities are key to foster adaptation towards a more diversified flood risk management strategy?

Analysis of adaptive capacities lacking, employed or emerging in pilots studies, based on pilot processes
Provides on a more abstract level to decision-makers which capacities are needed for planning, implementation and up-scaling of MLS
Roadmap for capacity building for pilots to become successful working on diversified FRM

Make sure to interview decision-makers about adaptive capacities

Referenties

FRAMES: Policy recommendations for an integrated approach to flood management, FRAMES, FRAMES, 31 maart 2020.

@@ Regel 1: / Regel 1: @@
 [[Bestand:Roadmap.jpg|gecentreerd|miniatuur]]
-The FRAMES Decision Support System, or DSS, is a road map with '''10 questions''' to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
+The FRAMES Decision Support System, or DSS, can be used as a road map with the following '''10 questions''' to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
-# What is the flood risk (sea, river, rainfall) and which are the flood risk challenges in your region?
+'''1 What is the flood risk (sea, river, rainfall) and which are the flood risk challenges in your region?'''
 ''Typical challenges for areas:''
 * Coastal flooding as main challenge (Zeeland, Denmark)
@@ Regel 12: / Regel 14: @@
 * Pilots: IPCC reports and national adaptation strategies
 Discuss flood risk scenarios and define challenges for resilient areas and communities with relevant stakeholders
+'''2 What is the emphasis of the current FRMS applied in your area?'''
+* Apply multilevel and multi-actor to discuss regional flood risk management strategies
+* Multilevel: EU, national, regional, local
+* Multi-actor: government, private companies, NGOs, citizens.
+'''3 How is flood risk management organized in my country?'''
+'''4 What is the desired situation in relation to the flood risk challenges for the region?'''
+'''5 What are potential MLS-actions to enhance the flood resilience of your region?'''
+Overview of actions based on analysis pilot activities
+* Linked to MLS layers
+* Linked to area context to apply actions: coastal, fluvial, pluvial
+* Linked to Diversification of Governance context to apply actions (or adaptation of FGRA required): low, medium, high
+* Pilots can be used as examples
+'''6 What is the impact of potential (spatial) actions on systems and sectors in the region?'''
+''Make sure to harmonize impact assessments with the national adaptation strategies''
+'''7 Who should be involved and what level should participation be?'''
+* Stakeholder analysis examples by project
+* Link to FRGA to support stakeholder analysis
+* Analysis of multilevel and multi-actor setting, including participation level, during pilot implementation
+* Analyse differences between pilot implementation and FRGA
+'''8 How can the implementation process for MLS-pilots be organized?'''
+There are three types of pilot implementation processes:
+* Goal oriented (Reimerswaal, …)
+* Participatory process oriented (UK)
+* Planning process oriented (DAPP Denmark)
+Differences are mainly based on the governance context, the organization in the lead in the pilot and the  role in the FRGA.
+'''9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results?'''
+'''10 Which capacities are key to foster adaptation towards a more diversified flood risk management strategy?'''
+* Analysis of adaptive capacities lacking, employed or emerging in pilots studies, based on pilot processes
+* Provides on a more abstract level to decision-makers which capacities are needed for planning, implementation and up-scaling of MLS
+* Roadmap for capacity building for pilots to become successful working on diversified FRM
+''Make sure to interview decision-makers about adaptive capacities''
 {{Project config}}
 {{Project

PR 00274: verschil tussen versies

Versie van 18 sep 2019 11:06

Referenties

Blijf op de hoogte!