LC 00401: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
(2 tussenliggende versies door 2 gebruikers niet weergegeven) | |||
Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
ST presented so far is implicitly positioned in a local, municipal context. The maxim is: think globally, act locally. This expresses the idea that global change starts with local initiatives to give good examples of improvements to be implemented on a larger scale. This bears the question: it | ST presented so far is implicitly positioned in a local, municipal context. The maxim is: think globally, act locally. This expresses the idea that global change starts with local initiatives to give good examples of improvements to be implemented on a larger scale. This bears the question: is it possible to embed the SI process in another SI process so that in the end we do act globally? The answer is given in the diagram shown below. The basic idea is that a SI process is seen as the implementation process in a higher level SI process. In this way, the SI process is extended from a local level to regional and national levels, and if we dream on, even up to the global world. | ||
Although the nested | Although the nested SI processes form a hierarchy, it does not mean that SI processes taken together have a strictly top-down or a bottom-up orientation. Just like a single SI process, the combined SI processes have circular processes at work at the same time. In this way, ideas and rules of engagement can flow freely upwards and downwards to set the right conditions for change at all levels. For instance, at the Mondial level, many nations have committed to the Paris-climate agreements. These agreements do set targets at the national level and below as part of assessment frameworks.. However, these agreements mostly address what to do do, not necessarily how to do it. It is up to national and local governments to the right way to approach it to get the job done. By doing so, we learn from our experiences in terms of new ways of doing things, i.e., innovations, and cultural values. The lessons learned can then be taken as input to establish future Mondial agreements. | ||
[[Bestand:The Social Theory process of getting beyond local initiatives.jpg|gecentreerd|miniatuur|599x599px|'''Figure:''' The Social Theory process of getting beyond local initiatives]] | [[Bestand:The Social Theory process of getting beyond local initiatives.jpg|gecentreerd|miniatuur|599x599px|'''Figure:''' The Social Theory process of getting beyond local initiatives]] | ||
{{LC Book config}} | {{LC Book config}} | ||
{{Light Context | {{Light Context |
Huidige versie van 20 jun 2022 om 14:33
ST presented so far is implicitly positioned in a local, municipal context. The maxim is: think globally, act locally. This expresses the idea that global change starts with local initiatives to give good examples of improvements to be implemented on a larger scale. This bears the question: is it possible to embed the SI process in another SI process so that in the end we do act globally? The answer is given in the diagram shown below. The basic idea is that a SI process is seen as the implementation process in a higher level SI process. In this way, the SI process is extended from a local level to regional and national levels, and if we dream on, even up to the global world.
Although the nested SI processes form a hierarchy, it does not mean that SI processes taken together have a strictly top-down or a bottom-up orientation. Just like a single SI process, the combined SI processes have circular processes at work at the same time. In this way, ideas and rules of engagement can flow freely upwards and downwards to set the right conditions for change at all levels. For instance, at the Mondial level, many nations have committed to the Paris-climate agreements. These agreements do set targets at the national level and below as part of assessment frameworks.. However, these agreements mostly address what to do do, not necessarily how to do it. It is up to national and local governments to the right way to approach it to get the job done. By doing so, we learn from our experiences in terms of new ways of doing things, i.e., innovations, and cultural values. The lessons learned can then be taken as input to establish future Mondial agreements.