PR 00206: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
(Adapted the assignment to 2020 situation) |
||
(2 tussenliggende versies door een andere gebruiker niet weergegeven) | |||
Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
=== Aim === | |||
The system of study in this assignment comprises the region “Kanaalzone Zeeuws-Vlaanderen” (between the Western Scheldt Estuary, shores of the channel Ghent – Terneuzen, Braakman creek recreational area, and to the South crossing the Dutch/Belgian border (including Isabella and Leopold canals). The aims of the study are threefold: | |||
#Setting criteria for robustness so that we can test future changes against these criteria. What is really robust and why? | |||
#Definition of an ideal Robust Water System for the region using the criteria defined under 1 and the input of strategic developments (Visie Waterbeheer 2050, SAZ+, Vitale Kanaalzone, Nieuwe Sluis) | |||
#To sketch an outline of the future of our Robust Water System (timeframe now to 2030 and 2050) starting from the current situation in order to determine how resilient it really is (foreward projection). This requires: an update of the project map of the region to the extent as if all described project possibilities have already been executed. This requires further detailing of the projects and expected outcome. | |||
#Translating the ideal resilient future to measures needed today (backward projection). | |||
#*Analyse what this means to currently desired interventions in the region. | |||
#*Determine which gaps still exist in relation to our ambitions and jointly define what is still required (and by when) to complete the desired picture. | |||
A group of six students will work on this assignment: | |||
* 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 3 | |||
* 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 4 | |||
{{Project config}} | {{Project config}} | ||
Regel 12: | Regel 24: | ||
Project Robust Water System aims to increase the resilience of the Zeeuws-Vlaanderen region by incorporating water multi-sourcing and ‘fit for use’ strategies. These strategies require close collaborations with stakeholders (end-users, government, research). Water sources are expanded towards Belgian polder run-off, municipal WWTP effluent, Dow WWTP effluent and rainwater. Agriculture is using polder run-off and potable water but do experience fresh water scarcity during periods of severe drought. Nature areas suffer from drought periods – overall there is a lack of salt nature. | Project Robust Water System aims to increase the resilience of the Zeeuws-Vlaanderen region by incorporating water multi-sourcing and ‘fit for use’ strategies. These strategies require close collaborations with stakeholders (end-users, government, research). Water sources are expanded towards Belgian polder run-off, municipal WWTP effluent, Dow WWTP effluent and rainwater. Agriculture is using polder run-off and potable water but do experience fresh water scarcity during periods of severe drought. Nature areas suffer from drought periods – overall there is a lack of salt nature. | ||
|Show summary= | |Show summary=Nee | ||
|Show navigation tree=Ja | |Show navigation tree=Ja | ||
|Create process and content pages=Nee | |Create process and content pages=Nee |
Huidige versie van 24 sep 2020 om 12:23
Aim
The system of study in this assignment comprises the region “Kanaalzone Zeeuws-Vlaanderen” (between the Western Scheldt Estuary, shores of the channel Ghent – Terneuzen, Braakman creek recreational area, and to the South crossing the Dutch/Belgian border (including Isabella and Leopold canals). The aims of the study are threefold:
- Setting criteria for robustness so that we can test future changes against these criteria. What is really robust and why?
- Definition of an ideal Robust Water System for the region using the criteria defined under 1 and the input of strategic developments (Visie Waterbeheer 2050, SAZ+, Vitale Kanaalzone, Nieuwe Sluis)
- To sketch an outline of the future of our Robust Water System (timeframe now to 2030 and 2050) starting from the current situation in order to determine how resilient it really is (foreward projection). This requires: an update of the project map of the region to the extent as if all described project possibilities have already been executed. This requires further detailing of the projects and expected outcome.
- Translating the ideal resilient future to measures needed today (backward projection).
- Analyse what this means to currently desired interventions in the region.
- Determine which gaps still exist in relation to our ambitions and jointly define what is still required (and by when) to complete the desired picture.
A group of six students will work on this assignment:
- 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 3
- 3 students on aims 1, 2 and 4