LC 00420: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
Regel 26: | Regel 26: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''''1.Protection/ defence''''' | |'''''1.Protection/ defence''''' | ||
| | |Hard infrastructure (dikes and pumping stations) | ||
| | |High attention to measures such as (FRR): | ||
| | * Dikes, dams, barriers, locks | ||
* Sluice gates, pumps | |||
* Drainage structure | |||
''No changes as a result of FRAMES interventions (interview with pilot manager, 2019).'' | |||
|Will remain high priority (increase dike security set out in ''Generalplan Küstenschutz''). | |||
''No changes as a result of FRAMES (interview with pilot manager, 2019).'' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''''2. Pro-action/ prevention via spatial planning''''' | |'''''2. Pro-action/ prevention via spatial planning''''' | ||
| | | | ||
| | |'''Some attention in FRAMES''' | ||
| | * Identify flood prone areas in coastal regions and install building restrictions | ||
* Possible outcome of FRAMES: integrated rural-urban drainage management (by the end of 2019) | |||
|Expectations: | |||
* Recommend building restrictions based on the identified flood prone areas in coastal regions and | |||
* Integrated rural-urban drainage management (by the end of 2019) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''''3. Preparation & response''''' | |'''''3. Preparation & response''''' | ||
|'''Low - middle attention''' | |||
* Flood warnings (done by NLWKN, BSH, WSA) | |||
* Existing disaster management | |||
* Existing evacuation route (but for nuclear disasters, not flooding) | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
* Actors are expected to continue with similar activities within their own agenda. | |||
* Use and implement the tailor made materials | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''4. Recovery''' | |'''4. Recovery''' | ||
| | |'''Low attention''' | ||
| | * People depend on private insurance | ||
| | * In case of national disasters recovery is supported by donations | ||
|'''Low attention''' | |||
* People depend on private insurance | |||
* In case of national disasters, recovery is supported by donations | |||
|''No changes in flood recovery as result of FRAMES (interview with pilot manager, 2019).'' | |||
|} | |} | ||
Versie van 11 jun 2019 09:42
Specific outcomes
- The posters and presentation about the survey, protocols of the meetings
- A publication in a national magazine on Water and Waste. It was published in a German journal (Wasser & Abfall). The target group are the practitioners in Germany (the water boards, the water administration).
- A 2-page flyer for individuals which precautionary measures based on BBK flyer.
- A data base with risk maps for spatial planning can be shared through a webserver or put on a CD (but not yet decided on). This data base can be used for the selection of evacuation, plans, elevation models, flooding situations.
- A 5-page booklet informing farmers about the problem analysis and what they can do; a guideline / checklist (is your farm elevated, do you have extra energy power) to assess if they are prepared or not and what to do if they are not prepared.
- A final brochure summarizing all the activities and the general situation in the Wesermarsch County
- A colleague of Jade University together with students has generated a website on the flood risk topic where they upload movies which (also related to FRAMES), booklets to improve flood risk awareness of children.
- Stakeholder analysis
- Rural-urban drainage conceptual report. Draw some conclusions from few reports provided by OOWV.
Process results
- Events: a Regional forum on ’flood partnerships’ and Flood awareness day, pilot end conference
- Increase collaboration among stakeholders from disaster management and water management authorities. The stakeholders are very active and open to meet, discuss and share information. This one of the biggest accomplishments of the project.
- Good organisation and planning of the activities among the stakeholders
- Increase knowledge/information about disaster management organisations and responsibilities for all stakeholders, especially Jade University lead of the pilot
- Increase awareness of citizens about flood risk and self-preparedness.
Flood risk management strategies (FRMS)
Flood risk governance in Germany is very diverse, with a main focus on defence. There are multiple sectors involved and integrated via spatial planning. Flood management is done by the central state together with the federal states. The national and federal governments give guidance to the local level authorities (Buijs et al., 2018 (Buijs et al., 11 juni 2019), Bormann, Ahlhorn and Klenke, 2013 (Bormann, H., Ahlhorn, F., 11 juni 2019)The table below shows the FRM strategies that were considered before, during and after FRAMES.
Layers of MLS | Before FRAMES | During FRAMES | After FRAMES |
---|---|---|---|
1.Protection/ defence | Hard infrastructure (dikes and pumping stations) | High attention to measures such as (FRR):
No changes as a result of FRAMES interventions (interview with pilot manager, 2019). |
Will remain high priority (increase dike security set out in Generalplan Küstenschutz).
No changes as a result of FRAMES (interview with pilot manager, 2019). |
2. Pro-action/ prevention via spatial planning | Some attention in FRAMES
|
Expectations:
| |
3. Preparation & response | Low - middle attention
|
| |
4. Recovery | Low attention
|
Low attention
|
No changes in flood recovery as result of FRAMES (interview with pilot manager, 2019). |