PR 00274: verschil tussen versies

Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
 
(45 tussenliggende versies door 4 gebruikers niet weergegeven)
Regel 1: Regel 1:
<imagemap>
{{#set:Imagename=6_Frames_DSS_final_kleur.jpeg}}
File:20200406 Frames DSS final.jpg|center|900px|20200406 Frames DSS final
rect 781 984 1099 1128 [[LC 00262]]
rect 1579 565 2248 873 [[LC 00275]]
rect 66 590 700 894 [[LC 00239]]
rect 1118 837 1403 988 [[LC 00330]]
rect 739 430 1029 591 [[LC 00332]]
rect 1047 619 1334 773 [[LC 00329]]
rect 1111 367 1396 513 [[LC 00291]]
rect 1559 858 1841 1011 [[LC 00303]]
rect 1824 1224 2004 1323 [[LC 00363]]
rect 294 1224 474 1323 [[LC 00363]]
rect 294 165 474 264 [[LC 00363]]
rect 1824 165 2004 264 [[LC 00363]]
rect 832 66 1464 363 [[LC 00292]]
rect 823 1133 1472 1414 [[LC 00289]]
</imagemap>


''Please note that the FRAMES team is currently working on the Decision Support System - this DSS will be finalized in the coming weeks and fully available on May 1st, 2020.''
==== Decision support for resilient authorities working on MLS strategies ====
The uncertainty of climate change is a major challenge for flood managers to make robust decisions about flood management options in the North Sea Region countries. In addition, the governance settings of each country adds to the complexity of  joint decision making for climate change adaptation to increase flood resilience. A so-called decision support system, or DSS, can assist authorities to identify the best options to increase flood resilience in their region.  


In this Decision Support System, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach:
The DSS is an integrated framework harmonized with the National Adaptation Strategies of the FRAMES countries, to support authorities during their decision-making process concerning more diversified and balanced strategies for flood risk management in their region.
* '''Layer 2, Spatial adaptation''': limits flood consequences (a) when applying spatial adaptation measures for vulnerable electricity grid assets
* '''Layer 3, Emergency management''': supports preparedness and emergency planning by (a) raising flood risk awareness of about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure; (b) update local flood action plans including evacuation routes and risk communication strategies based on updated flood risk maps; (d) update asset management plans;
* '''Layer 4, Resilient recovery''': when flood preparedness measures are taken, it leads to a better flood recovery for communities.
By clicking on the boxes in the figure above, you can find out what kind of actions are linked to that specific layers, what the lessons learned for that layer are, and what kind of capacities are needed to implement the action. A list of tools used to implement the selected action is included as well.


For questions, remarks or other comments, feel free to contact the researchers of the HZ University of Applied Sciences by clicking here.
The DSS has been jointly developed by the FRAMES consortium as a learning evaluation of the pilot activities; the experiences from all pilots have been integrated in the framework and local and regional contexts, climate, socio-economic, and hydraulic drivers were considered.  Via the learning evaluation in FRAMES relevant target groups for the DSS have been involved in the development: local/ regional/ national authorities from involved regions, infrastructure and (public) service providers, interest groups (NGOs) and higher education and research centres. Based on the interviews with pilot managers, transnational focus groups and monitoring of pilot outcomes, the DSS brings together the transnational learning and knowledge from 16 FRAMES pilots into the MLS approach. The lessons learnt were also translated into {{Cite|resource=Bestand:200407-frames policy recommendations a4 v4.pdf|name=policy recommendations|dialog=process-file-dialog}}. <imagemap>
File:20200702 Frames DSS final kleur.jpg|center|900px|20200702 Frames DSS final kleur
rect 756 984 1045 1128 [[LC 00262]]
rect 1575 571 2244 879 [[LC 00275]]
rect 62 573 696 877 [[LC 00239]]
rect 756 426 1035 573 [[LC 00332]]
rect 1143 653 1430 798 [[LC 00329]]
rect 1144 361 1429 499 [[LC 00291]]
rect 1820 1220 2000 1319 [[LC 00363]]
rect 290 1220 470 1319 [[LC 00363]]
rect 290 161 470 260 [[LC 00363]]
rect 1820 161 2000 260 [[LC 00363]]
rect 828 62 1460 359 [[LC 00292]]
rect 820 1129 1469 1410 [[LC 00289]]
rect 1143 876 1428 1005 [[LC 00330]]
rect 1577 882 1859 1000 [[LC 00303]]
</imagemap>''Figure 1: Decision Support System - click on the boxes to find out more.''
 
 
====== In this DSS, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach. By '''clicking on the boxes in the figure above''', the following information will be provided: ======
* A description of the action
* The application of this action in FRAMES
* Inter-dependencies with other MLS actions
* Lessons learnt in FRAMES
* Relevant adaptive capacities
* Tools applied in FRAMES
Based on the experience in FRAMES, the highlighted actions in the DSS framework provide:
* Authorities responsible for flood resilience: an overview and relevant knowledge in exploring a variety of MLS actions for enhancing FRM strategies.
* National/regional authorities: support for regional/local authorities in the adaptive planning of their area, taking into account climate change uncertainties and flood proof design and planning of spatial investments.
* Local and regional authorities: the possibility to conduct area based studies and explore additional actions to fine tune FRM strategies in their area or catchment.
* NGOs involved in natural flood management (NFM) and community resilience: the possibility to align their activities with mainstream FRM strategies
* NGOs and interest groups: strategies and tools to empower local communities to have a voice in FRM.
* Infrastructure and service providers: a position in the field of flood resilience.
* Higher education and research centres: available knowledge and cases on diversification of FRM and flood resilience.
Note that these actions, links and insights are the outcome of the pilot projects of the specific regions selected for FRAMES. Using this DSS for other regions will provide more insight into the possibilities and linkages of the MLS approach, but the exact recipe for successfully implementing MLS measures in other regions requires additional information about the governance context, the current flood risk management strategies, current and future flood scenarios and socio-economic development.
 
''For questions, remarks or other comments, feel free to contact the researchers of the HZ University of Applied Sciences by clicking {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00712|name=here|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}.''


{{Project config}}
{{Project config}}
{{Project
{{Project
|Name=Decision Support System
|Supercontext=PR 00069
|Supercontext=PR 00069
|Project type=Standaard
|Topcontext=PR 00069
|Topcontext=PR 00069
|Name=Decision Support System
|Start date=2016/10/01
|Start date=2016/10/01
|End date=2020/04/30
|End date=2020/04/30
|Summary=A road map with 10 questions to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
|Summary=A road map to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
|Show summary=Nee
|Show summary=Nee
|Show extra=Nee
|Show navigation tree=Ja
|Show navigation tree=Ja
|Show new page button=Ja
|Show new page button=Nee
|Show sub projects=Nee
|Show sub projects=Nee
|Show participants=Nee
|Show participants=Nee
|Show sources=Nee
|Show sources=Nee
|Is homepage=Nee
|Is homepage=Nee
|Show edit button=Ja
|Show edit button=Nee
|Show VE button=Ja
|Show VE button=Ja
|Show sidebar=Nee
|Show sidebar=Nee
|Show category label=Nee
|Show category label=Nee
|Show title=Ja
|Show title=Ja
|Project type=Standaard
}}
}}

Huidige versie van 30 mei 2024 om 09:51


Decision support for resilient authorities working on MLS strategies

The uncertainty of climate change is a major challenge for flood managers to make robust decisions about flood management options in the North Sea Region countries. In addition, the governance settings of each country adds to the complexity of  joint decision making for climate change adaptation to increase flood resilience. A so-called decision support system, or DSS, can assist authorities to identify the best options to increase flood resilience in their region.

The DSS is an integrated framework harmonized with the National Adaptation Strategies of the FRAMES countries, to support authorities during their decision-making process concerning more diversified and balanced strategies for flood risk management in their region.

The DSS has been jointly developed by the FRAMES consortium as a learning evaluation of the pilot activities; the experiences from all pilots have been integrated in the framework and local and regional contexts, climate, socio-economic, and hydraulic drivers were considered.  Via the learning evaluation in FRAMES relevant target groups for the DSS have been involved in the development: local/ regional/ national authorities from involved regions, infrastructure and (public) service providers, interest groups (NGOs) and higher education and research centres. Based on the interviews with pilot managers, transnational focus groups and monitoring of pilot outcomes, the DSS brings together the transnational learning and knowledge from 16 FRAMES pilots into the MLS approach. The lessons learnt were also translated into policy recommendations

LC 00262LC 00275LC 00239LC 00332LC 00329LC 00291LC 00363LC 00363LC 00363LC 00363LC 00292LC 00289LC 00330LC 0030320200702 Frames DSS final kleur
Over deze afbeelding

Figure 1: Decision Support System - click on the boxes to find out more.


In this DSS, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach. By clicking on the boxes in the figure above, the following information will be provided:
  • A description of the action
  • The application of this action in FRAMES
  • Inter-dependencies with other MLS actions
  • Lessons learnt in FRAMES
  • Relevant adaptive capacities
  • Tools applied in FRAMES

Based on the experience in FRAMES, the highlighted actions in the DSS framework provide:

  • Authorities responsible for flood resilience: an overview and relevant knowledge in exploring a variety of MLS actions for enhancing FRM strategies.
  • National/regional authorities: support for regional/local authorities in the adaptive planning of their area, taking into account climate change uncertainties and flood proof design and planning of spatial investments.
  • Local and regional authorities: the possibility to conduct area based studies and explore additional actions to fine tune FRM strategies in their area or catchment.
  • NGOs involved in natural flood management (NFM) and community resilience: the possibility to align their activities with mainstream FRM strategies
  • NGOs and interest groups: strategies and tools to empower local communities to have a voice in FRM.
  • Infrastructure and service providers: a position in the field of flood resilience.
  • Higher education and research centres: available knowledge and cases on diversification of FRM and flood resilience.

Note that these actions, links and insights are the outcome of the pilot projects of the specific regions selected for FRAMES. Using this DSS for other regions will provide more insight into the possibilities and linkages of the MLS approach, but the exact recipe for successfully implementing MLS measures in other regions requires additional information about the governance context, the current flood risk management strategies, current and future flood scenarios and socio-economic development.

For questions, remarks or other comments, feel free to contact the researchers of the HZ University of Applied Sciences by clicking here.































Referenties


Onderwerpen